Use case / SBPA-001
Review frontend project structure
User Problem
A nontechnical user wants Codex to inspect a small frontend project structure before asking for feature work.
Proof Claim Boundary
Operator dogfooding and product capability evidence only; no natural demand, GEO success, AI citation, AI recommendation, traffic, lead, revenue, or conversion claim.
Manual install only: yes. Hosted execution: false.
Sanitized Prompt
I want Codex to review a sample frontend project structure before feature work and return the key folders, risks, and cleanup checklist.
When To Use
- A nontechnical user wants Codex to inspect a small frontend project structure before asking for feature work.
- Use this workflow when the expected output is structure map; risk list; improvement plan.
When Not To Use
- Do not use this workflow to bypass the stated safety boundary: L1 local analysis. Planning or analysis only unless the user separately authorizes file edits.
- Do not treat the tested workflow as evidence of natural demand, AI citation, AI recommendation, traffic, lead, or conversion improvement.
Matched Solution
Review frontend project structure is the canonical solution route for this scenario.
MCP Workflow
search_solutions -> get_solution_detail -> recommend_solution_skills -> get_solution_install_plan
- Endpoint
https://mcp.getskillary.com/mcp- Manual install only
- Yes
- Hosted execution
- No
Recommended Skill Bundle
Frontend Structure Analyzer
frontend-structure-analyzer
Codebase Analysis Probe
codebase-analysis-probe
Create Distinctive, Production-grade Frontend Interfaces
create-distinctive-production-grade-frontend-interfaces
How Codex Explains And Executes The Plan
Confirm project tree, package scripts, and framework context; map routes, components, styling, state, and build entry points; list risks; propose cleanup steps and verification checks.
What You Need To Confirm
- Confirm the sanitized task inputs, expected output, and scope before Codex starts.
- Confirm whether Codex should return a plan only or may make reviewed local changes.
- Approve any manual package download, local file change, command execution, account action, or deployment separately.
- Review the verification checklist and stop if the result crosses the stated risk boundary.
Expected Output
Structure map; risk list; improvement plan.
Verification Checklist
- Matched solution slug is correct.
- Output covers folders, routes, components, risks, cleanup, and checks.
- No credentials, deploy, hosted execution, or private console action is used.
Risk Boundary
L1 local analysis. Planning or analysis only unless the user separately authorizes file edits.
- manual_install_only
- true
- hosted_execution
- false
What Was Not Done
No frontend files were edited, no app was built, no screenshot-based claim was made, no deployment ran, and no production system changed.
Readiness By GEO Stage
- crawl
- future crawlable use-case page; SEO supporting diagnostics only
- index
- future indexable V1 page and internal links; SEO supporting diagnostics only
- understand
- explains frontend structure review capability
- retrieve
- covers project structure review natural-language demand
- cite
- adds citable target URL, skill URLs, MCP workflow URL, and claim boundary
- click
- provides next-step CTAs
- convert
- CTA readiness only; no conversion evidence
Next Actions
Operator dogfooding and product capability evidence only; no natural demand, GEO success, AI citation, AI recommendation, traffic, lead, revenue, or conversion claim.
Tracking readiness only; no click or conversion evidence is generated by this local gate.