Code Quality Standards
code-quality-standards supports this scenario as part of the solution bundle.
Scenario solution / L1 local analysis
Direct answer: A user wants a focused code review before merging or continuing. GetSkillary maps this scenario to a reusable skill bundle and a read-only MCP discovery workflow.
code-quality-standards supports this scenario as part of the solution bundle.
codebase-analysis-probe supports this scenario as part of the solution bundle.
changelog-generator supports this scenario as part of the solution bundle.
Use this as read-only discovery and planning. The live endpoint does not execute the workflow or install packages.
search_solutions - Find scenario solutions by workflow problem.get_solution_detail - Inspect the scenario solution, risk boundary, skill bundle, and CTA.search_skills - Search the current public GetSkillary skill catalog.get_skill_detail - Inspect the primary or supporting skill detail.get_download_url - Get a manual download URL for the selected skill.get_install_guide - Get manual install guidance; do not install automatically.search_solutions("Review code quality from a diff or focused files")
search_skills("Code Quality Standards")
search_skills("Codebase Analysis Probe")
search_skills("Changelog Generator")
Local scenario-solution architecture only. This does not publish Batch 3, deploy production pages, add hosted execution, or claim AI citation, recommendation, ranking, click, lead, or conversion improvement.
What workflow should an AI agent use to review a code diff for real bugs?
A patch and the behavior it is supposed to implement.
A findings-first review with severity, file references, and test gaps.
Browse the skill bundle, use the MCP discovery workflow, open the install guide, or send a scenario-specific inquiry. Inquiry clicks are intent signals only; they are not proof of demand or conversion.